Comments for

Comment on What’s the Deal? by igp

igp — Tue, 06 Dec 2011 19:30:21 +0000

Comment on From the top… by Kasi Iorio

Kasi Iorio — Mon, 07 Feb 2011 12:14:53 +0000

So good! Although I donâ€™t see your blog much but I must say you always post amazing information and also the theme is reasonably good. Stop us updated mate! I enjoy your blog post and definately will continue appreciating your effort each time I visit.

Comment on Excerpt! by pilloq

pilloq — Mon, 21 Jun 2010 03:34:59 +0000

Oh, I forgot how lovely that last bit is! Somewhat Apollinaire-ish, somehow.

Comment on From the top… by dannyburton

dannyburton — Wed, 19 May 2010 11:40:53 +0000

When particles behave like groups of numbers and groups of numbers can be shown to behave like particles… is it still weird to ask if there might be a case for fundamental interactions to be emergent properties of number? More specifically, if it takes a minimum number of bits (literally) to describe a physical property of the early universe (or sub-atomic particle interactions) … where do the math and the physics separate in reality?

Comment on Some Thoughts by Jenna

Jenna — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 23:45:13 +0000

I already have a book of these! This is exactly the kind of stuff I wrote on the bus in my myriad notebooks. I’ll start putting some of it up here, but without bookends.

Comment on Some Thoughts by pillock

pillock — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 08:26:28 +0000

Now THAT’s a short-short story! Very beautiful work, better in this form than in any other one I can think of. Alert “Park Bench”. Bravo. I want to see a book of these, instead of a book of poetry.

Uh, your bookending bits…they are okay of course too.

Comment on Setoric by pillock

pillock — Sun, 20 Sep 2009 10:16:59 +0000

Oh my God I’ve had an apostrophe.

However, until we meet for beer…

I should confine myself to saying this: I think you’re trying to be too reductive too fast. Is it really just “pitches” that do the job, like Penfieldian electrodes? I’m much more inclined to believe the success of rhetoric lies in the, uh…parsing of musical phrases, if you will. Also, question-begging: Hitler and Lenin might well have been as successful in English if they had been speaking it.

I know, I know…you know that. But it’s a BLOG.

I would like to see you write something on the ancient Analog vs. Digital debate…but you know, with a twist.

What are you doing next week?

Comment on Setoric by Tyche

Tyche — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 22:41:55 +0000

This is what a “quick post” looks like. You can only see about twelve characters at a time when you type, which makes it very difficult to make cohesive complex sentences.

Comment on Pleonexy by pillock

pillock — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 06:40:50 +0000

Furthermore, the most insane idea anyone could ever have (and something that hearkens back to the CD-ROM games of the early Nineties, like the famous Monty Python brain-imploder), is for Jim Woodring to make a Frank-style virtual environment to roam around in and kind of play. I wonder if anyone’s doing that already…Jesus, that would be so messed-up. Absolutely insane. Possibly dangerous. I WOULD BUY TEN, AND DUMP NINE OF THEM IN THE WATER SUPPLY.

If you don’t already know Jim, if I haven’t shown you any Jim or if you haven’t already discovered him for yourself…we’ve gotta talk.

Okay, time to heat up that leftover pasta!

Comment on Pleonexy by pillock

pillock — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 06:35:13 +0000

Also: sweet title, for the subject matter.

As far as dream comics go: Rick Veitch, the above link, is a guy who always makes stuff I like. Then there’s my old Internet pal Jesse Reklaw, who does the Slow Wave page that you’ve seen. Best of all, though, is Jim Woodring. So check him out.